Proving carbon dating wrong

When oil wells are drilled, the oil is almost always found to be under great pressure.

proving carbon dating wrong-9

Therefore scientists must make a guess with regard to what they believe the original conditions might have been.The shorter the time involved, the more likely that a specific process has been constant, and unaltered by external influences.In fact, the separation rate depends on the distance to the 6Note: Even though the maximum age obtained from this method is more than 10,000 years, it is nevertheless much younger than the alleged 4.5 billion year age for the Earth-Moon system proposed by evolutionists.Note also that nobody knows how the Moon got to be in its present orbit.These are: In each of these cases it is not possible to prove that the assumptions are true.

For example flooding can greatly alter sedimentation rates, and with clocks over 5,000 years old, the original conditions cannot be known with certainty.

Or to say it another way: there is a LOT of scientific evidence that suggests the Earth is perhaps only thousands of years old, and that the year age that evolution-believing "scientists" have LOUDLY and repeatedly proclaimed to be a fact, is actually based on a strong desire to eliminate God from His own Creation rather than on scientific facts.

A "clock" is any geophysical or astronomical process that is changing at a constant rate.

It also strongly suggests that something happened around 4,500 to Note also that it is possible for trees to produce more than one growth ring per year, which would shorten the above estimated ages of these trees.

Also, with regard to fossil tree rings, the author has been unable to find any documented instances of fossil trees having more than about 1500 rings.

In fact, such young earth indicators are in the majority.