If you want to find a true lady, try https://j4l.com/402006 you will see that these girls are hot, smart, feminine. They come from different culture, more family-oriented. I think this is the kind of ladies that most of our men deserve! Apparently plenty of feces updated their tos - only WOMEN' S photos are rejected if we use filters of any kind. I had five photos - and I was very much 'me' and filter free in my main one (your main pic should be clear and unmanipulated, fair enough), but they IMMEDIATELY (within seconds!) took down two others I posted - one with bunny ears and another for no valid reason whatsoever, telling me they did not meet their new extreme requirements (you must post only clear face and body shots). Oh but what do I see - ah yes, TONS of MEN using filters (some e.g.
I would not give any of these women the time of day if I were to meet them on the street.Yet in spite of their poor condition and quality, due to their extreme numbers advantage, they expect you to be Prince Charming.cringe attempts at 'poetry', which amounted to nothing more than word salad (well, 'graphorrhea' - if you want to get technical), and some copy paste pick-up line drivel. I notice there's a lot of bitter reviewers here bashing women for not answering their messages. Absolutely insane I will add One woman on her headline said she is tired of men offering to pay her bills.More often than not, we're bombarded with too many (duh) - it gets overwhelming. Maybe you scare (bully) the women you perceive as conventionally 'hot' off sites like these by constantly accusing them of being 'bots'. If we're not attractive enough - you dehumanize us. If that is true the desperate men should hang the heads in shame Always issues trying to log into this site.dog ears and nose, obstructing their faces completely!
way more deceptive than mine was) in their main photo.
Instead, I was flooded (immediately) with sexually threatening messages.
I also got repeatedly accused (in very hostile fashion) of being a 'scammer' (just like on nll (niche dating site), zoosk etc.) - super offensive btw.
You want to get strict about your photo policies, that's fine, but I'm pretty sure only applying it to women is discrimination. Oh and here's some advice - if you want to weed out men that aren't serious or even literate (setting these parameters might leave you with a dozen or so males to choose from on the entire site) - filter your mail so they have to write 300 characters minimum for the message to go through at all.
You might get less mail (these lazy men now treat ALL dating sites like Tinder...swiping and liking with zero effort put into messaging...character requirement or not), but you'll find that quality matters over quantity - although quite a few dullards wasted their word count by complaining about having to do something as outlandish as write an entire paragraph (oh the humanity! I guess anything more than 160 characters hurts some people's heads these days....
Guys, it's high time we get off the couch and ditch these types of sites!!